General

1. Mark the incorrect sections or parts that need modification.
2. Place a mark on the right side of the incorrect line(s) that require changes.
3. Use comments as an example of marking.

Details

1. Title: Effectiveness, Specification, and Clarity.
2. Abstract: Should be complete and describe the essence of the manuscript.
3. Keywords: Should reflect the key concepts of the manuscript.
4. Introduction: Must be up-to-date, original, relevant to the topic, and compatible with the main objectives of the study.
5. Methodology: Should emphasize the procedures and data analysis for empirical studies.
6. Results: Must focus on the accuracy of the analysis.
7. Findings: Should highlight the latest discoveries, relevance to related researchers, and the scientific contribution of the findings or ideas to the development of science.
8. Conclusion: Should be logical, valid, concise, and clear.
9. Suggestions: Should provide recommendations for practical actions, new theoretical development, and further research.
10. Figures/Tables: Should be centrally aligned, not cropped, of high quality for readability, properly titled, and referenced with capitalized letters.
11. References: Should include the most recent and relevant sources from primary books. Rules: At least 80% should be from journals or related scientific research published after 2010; a minimum of three book sources is required; at least 80% of references should be cited in the text or artistic materials.

Complete Manuscript Review Process

• Writing:

• Is the manuscript easy to follow, with logical development and clear organization?
• Is it concise and easy to understand?
• Are there any sections that should be reduced, removed, expanded, or added?
• Check for major issues in mechanics, including grammar, punctuation, and spelling. (If only a few areas need revision, provide specific notes to guide the author).
• If errors appear consistently throughout the text, select only one or two examples—do not attempt to edit everything.
• Abbreviations: Should be used wisely and structured in a way that ensures readers can easily recall what they represent.
• Ensure compliance with the journal’s style, format, and template guidelines.
• Provide citations when presenting evidence-based information from external sources.

Decision Categories

1. Fill out the provided review form.
2. Publish: No revision needed.
3. Minor revision: Can be revised by the Editor-in-Chief or an assisting editor.
4. Major revision: Can only be revised by the author.
5. Rejected: Not scientific or contains excessive issues.