|
ABOUT THIS JOURNAL
|
|---|
| Focus and Scope |
| Editorial Team |
| Reviewer Team |
| Contact Us |
| ISSUES |
| Current Issues |
| All Issues |
| Articles in Press |
| Browse Journals |
| Proceeding |
| FOR AUTHOR |
| Privacy Statement |
| Publication Ethics |
| Peer Review Process |
| Open Acces Policy |
| TUTORIAL |
| For Author |
| For Reviewer |
| For Managing Editor |
| For Board of Editors |
Peer Review Process
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
General Rule: Mark incorrect sections on the right side of the line and use comments for specific guidance.
???? Manuscript Details
- ✅ Title: Effective & Clear
- ✅ Abstract: Complete essence
- ✅ Intro: Up-to-date & Original
- ✅ Method: Clear procedures
- ✅ Results: Accurate analysis
- ✅ Conclusion: Logical & Valid
???? References (80/20 Rule)
- ✅ Min 80% from Journals (>2010)
- ✅ Min 3 Book sources
- ✅ 80% must be cited in text
- ✅ High quality Figs/Tables
✍️ Writing Quality
- ✅ Logical & Clear organization
- ✅ Concise & Easy to understand
- ✅ Proper Grammar & Spelling
- ✅ Wise use of Abbreviations
- ✅ Follows Journal Template
⚖️ Decision Categories
- ???? Publish: No revision
- ???? Minor: Editor can fix
- ⚠️ Major: Author must fix
- ❌ Rejected: Not scientific

Indexed & Registered with e-ISSN: 3090-0646 | Open Access Journal under CC-BY 4.0