Perbandingan Upah Anggota dan Bukan Anggota Serikat Pekerja di Indonesia: Dekomposisi Blinder-Oaxaca

Authors

  • Hafiyyanti Nugraha Ms.
  • Dwini Handayani Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51805/jmbk.v3i1.34

Keywords:

serikat pekerja, perbedaan upah, dekomposisi Blinder-Oaxaca

Abstract

This study aims to study the differences in wages for members and non-union members in Indonesia with a sample of 17,650 data. The details of the sample used are 1,855 samples are workers union members, and 15,795 samples are non-union members aged 15-64 years from IFLS5 2014, both formal and informal workers. The results of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition of the difference between the wages of members and non-union members show that union members earn 0.40 log points higher wages than workers who are not union members. Meanwhile, in the formal sector, the wage difference was higher, reaching 0.50 log points. The gap that occurs is explained by two main factors, namely the explained factor or worker characteristics factor and the unexplained factor. Unexplained factors are other factors that are not included in the research model, such as employment positions and company characteristics. The contribution of the explained factor to all workers contributed the most to the wage gap. In general, workers who are members of trade unions are concentrated in the male gender, have higher education, and live in urban areas.

References

Bhandari, A. K. (2010). Does union membership pay off? Evidence from organized Indian manufacturing industries. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 459–469.

Borjas, G. J., & Van Ours, J. C. (2013). Labor economics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Boston.

Bryson, A. (2014). Union wage effects. IZA World of Labor.

Budiono, A. R. (2016). Hak Kebebasan Berserikat Bagi Pekerja Sebagai Hak Konstitusional. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(4), 788–808.

Card, D. (2001). The effect of unions on wage inequality in the US labor market. ILR Review, 54(2), 296–315.

Centeno, M., & Novo, A. A. (2014). The impact of unionization on employment and wages. Citeseer.

Farber, H. S., Herbst, D., Kuziemko, I., & Naidu, S. (2021). Unions and inequality over the twentieth century: New evidence from survey data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(3), 1325–1385.

Guschanski, A., & Onaran, O. (2016). Determinants of the wage share: a cross-country comparison using sectoral data.

Haeussler, C., & Sauermann, H. (2016). The division of labor in teams: A conceptual framework and application to collaborations in science. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Ntuli, M., & Kwenda, P. (2014). Labour unions and wage inequality among African men in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 31(2), 322–346.

Pollmann-Schult, M. (2011). Marriage and earnings: Why do married men earn more than single men? European Sociological Review, 27(2), 147–163.

Susilo, T. S., Taufiq, A., & Astrika, L. (2015). Peran Serikat Pekerja/serikat Buruh Di Kabupaten Purwakarta Dalam Proses Penetapan Upah Minimum (Studi Kasus Federasi Serikat Pekerja Metal Indonesia). Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 4(3), 171–180.

Yao, Y., & Zhong, N. (2010). Unions Improve Chinese Workers’ Welfare-Results from 1,268 Firms. East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.

Published

2022-04-30

Issue

Section

Artikel